Why Progress Stalls – And What to Do When You Feel Stuck

Then, quietly, it stopped feeling that way. The effort is the same. The results aren't coming. And somewhere in that gap, a familiar question surfaces: what's the point?

This is the moment most behaviour change attempts end. Not with a dramatic decision to quit but with a slow drift back toward whatever came before. The plateau doesn't announce itself. It just arrives. And most people read it the same way: as proof that the approach isn't working, or that they're not cut out for this, or that the early results were a fluke.

The research points to a different explanation entirely.

James Clear, author of Atomic Habits (2018), uses a simple image to show what's happening during a plateau.

Picture an ice cube sitting in a cold room. You slowly raise the temperature: one degree, two degrees, five, ten. Nothing changes. The ice just sits there. Then, at one more degree, it melts. Not slowly – all at once.

Clear's point is that the work happening below the surface is real, even when you can't see it yet. Those degrees of heat weren't wasted. They were building toward the change that followed.

He calls this the plateau of latent potential: the phase where effort is building without yet showing up in results. This is a useful way of thinking about it rather than a clinical finding, but it lines up with research on how learning works. And it points toward something performance researchers have been studying for decades, though what they found is more useful than simply "keep going."

Anders Ericsson, a psychologist at Florida State University, spent years studying how experts in demanding fields – like chess, music, medicine – got so good at what they do. His key paper on deliberate practice, published in Psychological Review in 1993 with colleagues Ralf Krampe and Clemens Tesch-Römer, is one of the most cited pieces of research in the field. And what it found about plateaus is frequently misunderstood.

Plateaus don't happen because your brain is quietly doing hidden work in the background. They happen when performance reaches a "good enough" level and the practice becomes automatic. When we stop pushing at the edge of what we can do – when the habit becomes comfortable and easy – improvement stops. Not because the foundation is building, but because the brain has settled into autopilot.

For Ericsson, the plateau isn't something to wait out. It's something to break through – by bringing difficulty, focus, and feedback back into the practice. The experts he studied didn't plateau less because they were more talented. They plateaued less because they noticed when things had become automatic and deliberately made it harder again.

This matters, because it means there are two different kinds of plateau and they need different responses.

The first is the consolidation plateau. You're consistent, the approach is right, and the results just aren't showing up yet. This is Clear's ice cube. The build-up is real. A bit more time, and the output may start to appear.

The second is the automaticity plateau. You're consistent, but the practice has become so routine it's stopped pushing you forward. You're going through the motions without any real challenge. This is Ericsson's finding. Waiting longer won't help here, what's needed is deliberate disruption.

Both feel the same from the inside and that's the problem. The flatness, the doubt, the sense that effort isn't translating; it's identical whether you're consolidating or stuck on autopilot. Which is why the feeling alone can't tell you what to do next. But the evidence can.

The plateau matters so much because of what people typically do when they hit it.

When effort stops producing visible results, the most natural response is to think something has gone wrong. The approach isn't working. The goal was too big. You're not the kind of person who can keep this up. And so stopping, or switching to something else, feels logical.

This is made harder by the fact that early progress in most habit attempts is often the most visible. Like the first few weeks of exercise, or better sleep, or a new morning routine – change tends to show up quickly at first. Then the rate of visible improvement slows down, even though the underlying work is continuing.

Quitting at the plateau, either type, means stopping before you've worked out what's actually going on. And in most cases, that's both possible and useful to figure out.

When you notice progress has stalled, try these four questions before drawing any conclusions.

Is the effort actually consistent? Not "have I been trying" but specifically: how many times this week did I actually do the thing I committed to? The emotional flatness of a plateau can make effort feel harder than it is, which means we sometimes think we're being consistent when the frequency has actually dropped. Check the actual numbers.

Has the practice become automatic rather than challenging? This is Ericsson's question, and it's the most important one. If what you're doing has become effortless, it may have stopped pushing you forward. Like if your goal was staying calm at bedtime and your breathing routine has become so automatic it's not actually helping you regulate anymore – you've hit automaticity. The plateau is a sign to introduce a more specific challenge, not to stop.

What does the longer arc look like? A two-week plateau after six weeks of consistent effort looks very different from a two-week plateau after two weeks. Zooming out – looking at where you started, not just where you are right now – can change the picture considerably.

Am I measuring the right thing? Early in any habit change, the most meaningful measure is consistency, not outcome. Did I show up? Did I do the thing I committed to? If you've been showing up consistently but only tracking the end result, the plateau may be less about the practice and more about what you're choosing to look at.

There's a temptation in habit content to promise that if you just keep going, results will definitely come. That's not a promise this article is going to make. Sticking with it alone isn't enough. The approach matters, feedback matters, and specificity matters too.

But what the research does suggest is that quitting at the plateau is almost always too soon. If you're in a consolidation phase, the foundation may be building even though you can't see it yet. If you're in an automaticity plateau, the fix isn't quitting – it's making the practice harder and more specific again.

The question to carry into next week isn't is this worth continuing? It's am I stalled, or am I building? Answer that honestly, adjust if you need to, and take the next small step.

Progress, not perfection.

The 90-Day Identity Shift Journal in the StepChange Living store is built for exactly this phase – the weeks where motivation has levelled off but the habit isn't yet embedded. The reflection checkpoints at Day 30, 60, and 90 are designed to help you see the foundation you're building, even when the results aren't showing up yet.

If you're not on the newsletter yet, join us for regular research-backed tools for overwhelmed parents and professionals.

Here at StepChange Living we’re about making real change through small steps.

Please note: This content is for educational purposes and is based on publicly available research and personal experience. Michael is a researcher and fellow traveller, not a therapist or clinician. Any frameworks provided are practical starting points, not clinical interventions. This content doesn't constitute professional psychological advice, coaching, or therapy, and shouldn't be used as a substitute for professional support. If you're experiencing significant mental health challenges or personal difficulties, please reach out to a qualified professional. See our Terms and Conditions for more information.